New study says Minami-soma as safe as Western Japan cities – do they really expect us to believe this?

Fukushima 311 Voices

新しい調査によると、南相馬市は西日本の都市と同じくらい安全だそうです。こんな調査結果が信じられるでしょうか?

On September 5, 2017, Minami-soma city made a statement on the city’s radiation levels compared to 3 cities in West Japan, which has been reported in several newspapers. It’s important to comment on this study because the statement is intended to persuade the population to return to live there.

We are publishing comments on the articles below after having discussed with M. Ozawa of the citizen’s measurement group named the “Fukuichi Area Environmental Radiation Monitoring Project“. For English speaking readers, please refer to the article of Asahi Shimbun in English. For our arguments we refer to other articles published in other newspapers – Fukushima Minyu and Fukushima Minpo – which are only in Japanese.

2017年9月5日、南相馬市は同市と西日本の3市の外部被曝ばく線量を測定し、その結果について発表しました。いくつかの新聞が報道しています。この発表は住民帰還を促す意図を持っていますので、コメントすることが重要かと思われます。

ふくいち周辺環境放射線モニタリングプロジェクトの小澤洋一さんにお話をお聞きし、以下のコメントを投稿いたします。以下に引用するのは朝日新聞の記事ですが、これは英語と日本語と両方で報道されているためです。朝日新聞には記載されていないことが福島民友福島民報に報道されていますので、そちらも適宜引用させていただきます。

Here are the locations of Minami-soma and the 3 other cities.
南相馬市と記事に登場する3市の位置については下記の地図をご覧ください。

map 4 cities

Here is the article of the Asahi Shimbun

Fukushima city shows…

View original post 902 more words

Radiation Hotspots Near Tokyo

2.17μSv/hr ~ 19 millisieverts per year, approx 214km south west of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant:

Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

From Sugar Nat

Present radiation hotspots in Nagareyama city, Chiba Prefecture (near Tokyo)

20992938_1763450760350341_7588483373692891717_n
Measure taken at 1m from the ground : 0.57μSv/h

21032739_1763450793683671_4221181375008795887_n

Measure taken at 50cm from the ground : 0.89μSv/h

20953963_1763452647016819_2203591793701310620_n

Measure taken at ground level : 2.17μSv/h

Read more in Japanese :

http://hotspot-i-t.blogspot.fr/2017/06/blog-post_11.html?m=1

View original post

Fukushima Insoluble Radioactive Particles (part 3)

Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

1.jpg

We are presenting here a transcription of an NHK TV documentary (note1) on insoluble radioactive particles found in Fukushima and in the Tokyo metropolitan region. This is the 3rd part of the 3 parts.

Her is the 1st part : https://fukushima311voices.wordpress.com/2017/07/14/insoluble-radioactive-particles-part-1/

Here is the 2nd part : https://fukushima311voices.wordpress.com/2017/07/14/insoluble-radioactive-particles-part-2/

As you can see below, small insoluble radioactive particles are dispersed in the Tokyo metropolitan area. We believe that this represents serious health problems for the population in terms of internal irradiation, since the insoluble radioactive particles remain in the body for a long time. For anybody who would stay in this metropolitan area, further radioprotection against internal irradiation would be required.

 

2.jpg

Takeda: I will ask Yuichi Moriguchi, who is carrying out investigations on radio-contamination caused by the accident, including the insoluble radioactive particles, how many of such insoluble radioactive particles exist and in what range of area?

Moriguchi:…

View original post 1,485 more words

Fukushima Insoluble Radioactive Particles (part 2)

Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

1.jpgWe are presenting here a transcription of an NHK TV documentary (note1) on insoluble radioactive particles found in Fukushima and in the Tokyo metropolitan region. This is the 2nd part of the 3 parts.

Here is the first part.

3

5

4

Insoluble radioactive particles that do not dissolve in water.

This characteristic is supposed to make a big difference when considering health effects.

In the past, radioactive cesium emitted in the nuclear accident was thought to be carried away adhering to water-soluble particles called aerosols in the atmosphere. When it touches the water the particle melts and the cesium diffuses and gets diluted. The same is true when it is inhaled in the lungs; the water-soluble cesium melts into the body fluid and spreads thinly throughout the body. Then it is supposed to be discharged gradually by the metabolic activity, and decreases by half from 80 to 100 days in the case…

View original post 839 more words

Fukushima Insoluble Radioactive Particles (part 1)

Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

1.jpg

We are presenting here a transcription of an NHK TV documentary (note1) on insoluble radioactive particles found in Fukushima and in the Tokyo metropolitan region. Since it is quite heavy with images, it will be uploaded in 3 parts.

These particles contain cesium, which has the property to dissolve in water. However, in the case of these particles, the cesium was taken into glass-like particles during the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident before it was blown away by the explosion. These particles do not dissolve in water, and as a consequence the cesium will remain longer both in the environment and in the human body, which will modify the impact of radioactive materials on the environment and on health.

Here the video in Japanese: https://youtu.be/ipOEfS-06FM

Takeda: A round particle like a marble.
Rugged particles like asteroids.
Presently, the researchers are paying attention to them.

1a

Very small particles contain radioactive cesium.

View original post 567 more words

In Fukushima, a land where few return

Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

The evacuation orders for most of the village of Iitate have been lifted. But where are the people?

1.jpgThe build-up of contaminated bags is slowly changing the landscape of Iitate, Fukushima Prefecture.

IITATE, FUKUSHIMA PREF. – Some day when I have done what I set out to do, I’ll return home one of these days, where the mountains are green, my old country home, where the waters are clear, my old country home.

— “Furusato,” Tatsuyuki Takano

A cherry tree is blooming in the spring sunshine outside the home of Masaaki Sakai but there is nobody to see it. The house is empty and boarded up. Weeds poke through the ground. All around are telltale signs of wild boar, which descend from the mountains to root and forage in the fields. Soon, the 60-year-old farmhouse Sakai shared with his mother and grandmother will be demolished.

I don’t feel…

View original post 2,181 more words

“No one died” implies a cruel hierarchy

HAINWA-C6TH-copyright-Lis-Fields-2017

Haniwa – tomb figures, Saitama, C6th, Tokyo National Museum of Art, Tokyo, 217 km south west of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant

Advocates of nuclear power frequently say that “no one died” as a result of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. They mean that, unlike the tsunami and earthquake which killed at least 15,894 people, with a further 2,562 people still missing, no one was killed as a result of exposure to radiation.

Even if it were true that no one died, this is a cruel, disrespectful thing to say as it denies the importance and severity of the profound suffering and illness [1] which are undeniably a direct result of the nuclear disaster.

Is it right to place death above suffering in a hierarchy like this? Surely either consequence is unacceptable and should not be compared. Any person with any empathy who has experienced or witnessed excruciating, protracted illness, physical or mental, will understand this.

Many scientists remain concerned about what the future holds for those who were – and who continue to be – exposed to radioactivity from inside the reactors at Fukushima Daiichi. There are already 183 cases of confirmed and suspected thyroid cancer among 381,282 people who were under 18 in 2011 [2]. This is equivalent to an incidence of 511 per million people. Prior to 2011, the incidence of thyroid cancer in Japan among this age group was 1-3 per million.

3A-KORIYAMA-PLAY-CORNER-copyright-Lis-Fields-2017-2391

Linking Fukushima with Chernobyl, 3a! Koriyama, Koriyama City, Fukushima, 60 km west of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant

The brightly coloured things for children at 3a Koriyama! Family Club contrast with the materials on the the walls above.

A teatowel from Belarus, the country most severely contaminated by the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986. After 31 years this catastrophe continues to unfold [3] with devastating health and environmental consequences. In Belarus and Ukraine, radiogenic illnesses and birth defects continue to arise in over 453,000 children born of parents who were themselves children in 1986 [4].

Next to the teatowel, a reproduction of a grim painting of a mother and child, by Wakana, conveys a terrible suffering and vulnerability.

 


[1] “Between 2011 and 2014, nearly 2,000 Japanese citizens, including many old people, died as the result of illness or suicides connected with the evacuations … [which were] necessary to avoid large radiation exposures from the radioactive fallout carried by the plumes”.

Dr Ian Fairlie, ‘Summing The Health Effects of the Fukushima Nuclear disaster,’ 2015, http://www.ianfairlie.org/news/summing-the-health-effects-of-the-fukushima-nuclear-disaster/

[2] 183 confirmed and suspected thyroid cancers:

http://fukushimavoice-eng2.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/fukushima-thyroid-examination-december.html

And at least one further case of thyroid cancer confirmed but not reported: http://www.apnewsarchive.com/2017/A-child-diagnosed-with-thyroid-cancer-after-the-Fukushima-nuclear-accident-is-missing-from-government-checkup-records-an-aid-group-says-raising-questions-about-the-thoroughness-and-tra/id-fe042c9dc43448669bb661521353ce71

[3] Kim Hjelmgaard, USA Today, ‘Exiled Scientist: Chernobyl Is Not Finished, It Has Only Just Begun,https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/04/17/nuclear-exile-chernobyl-30th-anniversary/82896510/

[4] Dr Ian Fairlie, TORCH-2016 [The Other Report on Chernobyl]: An Independent Scientific Evaluation of The Health-related Effects of The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster: https://www.global2000.at/sites/global/files/GLOBAL_TORCH%202016_rz_WEB_KORR.pdflsummary of the report and link here: http://www.ianfairlie.org/news/30-years-after-chernobyl/